January 14, 2012.
Dr. Manmohan Singh,
Prime Minister of India,
South Block,
New Delhi.
Dear Prime Minister:
I write this letter regarding the matter of retirement of the Chief of Army Staff Gen V.K. Singh as decided by your Government.
I am constrained to take up this matter in view of the fact that Gen Singh not only has an impeccable battle-field record but he has also earned an extremely good name in the ranks of the army and outside as a person who is ready to take steps to clean up corruption whenever and wherever it has come to his notice in the army.
All the facts are known to you and I believe they are contained in a statutory complaint made by Gen Singh himself with all the relevant documents in the Ministry of Defence. The Raksha Mantri Mr. Antony gave me an appointment and I had met him to discuss this matter. But from what he told me it appears that for the resolution of the matter it is not in his hands and that is why since you are the Prime Minister, I am writing this letter for I have a deep respect for you and for your personal integrity.
The issue is not the question of changing the date of birth as was given in the form when Gen Singh filled his form on joining the army. Two points are amply clear from the documents (1) that his date of birth in the matriculation certificate is 1951 and in the form filled by him it is 1950. As far as the filled up form is concerned, Gen Singh at that stage was a class X student and it could well be that the form was filled up by somebody, e.g. his teacher. But more importantly whether his date of birth is 1950 or 1951 in the application form, it gave him no benefit as far as his service in the army is concerned and no benefit in his subsequent career. It is important to bring to your notice that four former Chief Justices of the Supreme Court of India found it compelling to write out their opinion, one of which opinion was sought by the Central Authority which is within the army, namely, the Adjutant General’s office, namely, from Justice J.S. Verma and they were all unanimous that legally and judicially the date of birth at any time when a dispute arises can only be determined on the basis of the school leaving certificate which in this case is 1951. I have also been told authoritatively but orally about the opinion of the Attorney General of India, but his opinion is based on a question that was posed in a rigged manner against the rightful claim of Gen Singh. I urge you to disregard the same and use your own appreciation of the facts. The core point is that the entire service record of Gen Singh clearly show that the Adjutant General’s office after due “verification and authentication from the state of his selection in the army, the date of birth has been nothing but 10.5.1951 and not 10.5.1950. This date of birth, viz. 10.5.1951 is also the same date given by the successful candidate Gen V.K.Singh at the entry point and accepted by the UPSC as correct at the time of selection.
The media is naturally being organized by some and you know that is not difficult. The nation cannot treat him as officer sterling in unfinished career and dropped, targeted and destroyed in this manner. I have my own theories of why this is being dumped and demoralize the jawans in the army.
I urge you with respect to intervene and ensure that this matter is settled on merit and in the larger interest of the nation and that it will not be necessary to undergo a massive litigation launched by a body called Grenadiers Association of Rohtak, Haryana and pending in the Supreme Court.
Yours sincerely,
( SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY )
An highly apt approach by Shri Subramanian Swamy who seems to believe, like majosity of d Indians that Gen VK Suingh is being eased out due to extraneous considerations at the behest of certain(glaring) vested interests. But, will our PM who in his UPA 2 avtar has never proved to be d "real" PM of India,accept d sane advice ? I have my doubts!!
ReplyDeleteI as a citizen of this country, having the highest regard for our forces believe our general as is his case. And certainly hope MMS will listen to sense here. Personally I will not forgive him if he plays with our armed forces like he has played with us the junta.
ReplyDeleteSuch eloquent reasoning, sage advice, must be listened to attentively, and a sensible decision taken by those who rule. But, then, what do we get to see? A govt that acts dumb and sits on the matter all these years, now uses its proxies to humiliate the General.
ReplyDeleteThe TV debates showed the biased views of some anchors, as well as panelists. Somehow they want to see the back of the General. Why? Who is going to be benefited if Gen V.K. Singh is ousted now? How long can the nation tolerate these dirty tricks of our rulers?
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteMMS will never listen to either his inner voice nor does he have guts to do so, he is a puppet placed as frontman for all the loot that happens in background, this is what Sonia meant, "Her Inner conscience said that when she can loot without limit, why does she need PM post", let this be the last nail in the coffin of Congress, Sup Court will trash the govt in this case too
ReplyDeleteMMS has ensured that his rule destroyed every Institution that India was proud of once,WTF his integrity is meant for, Deifnition of Integrity has been tamed by this MMS MF
Paid Prostitute media will be the first to be thrown out if a nationalist government comes in India, Congress will be history, the current bankruptcy of good ideas and resorting to Cheap politics has exposed congress idealogy and ther is no way to come out of it
Thanks Dr.Swamy for writing to the PM on the DOB issue of the COAS. A matter blown up by vested interests.
DeleteIf such goof ups can happen to a Service chief, I shudder to think of the lakhs of silent soldiers.
Now that the matter is in the SCI, even MMS can't do anything.
Maximum of you appear to be politicians......let the matter be solved.
DeleteThanks Dr Swamy
ReplyDeletewe proud of you
The government can give 'extension' of one year also in this case. This may be an option.
ReplyDelete