Forked tongued Congress and National Shame
Batla House encounter is real says P.Chidambaram.Batla House encounter
faked claims Digvijaya Singh. Now both belong to the Congress. The UPA
government is the Congress government for all purpose. And the Home
Minister asserts that Batla House encounter was real. But a Congress party
secretary claims that it is faked. Whom are we to believe? Does the
Congress think that they can take the UP voters for a ride? Or does the
Congress think that it can say yes and no at the same breathe- and get away
with it? Does the Congress think that confusing the people it stands to
gain? Whom do we believe the Home Minister or the Congress secretary?
What is the underlying reason for this dichotomy? Why this double talk.
Take what suits you but let us have the Muslim votes. The Congress party
when it wants tries to distance itself from the Government but Mrs Sonia
Gandhi holds the remote control. Why this petty vested interest even at the
cost of the national security? Cutting the branch on which the Congress
sits will not help it. It looks that the Congress will stoop to any level
to gain the Muslim votes. But it forgets that the Muslim voter is no
fool-he can be fooled for some time by but some but not all the time by all.
Where does Rahul Gandhi stand in this-with the government or with his
party? Stoic silence-is not the answer and cannot be a leadership
attribute. Digvijaya made his claim in the presence of RG. Does he endorse
his views? What is ridiculous in a way but very troubling is the fact that
Chidambaram states that right from the beginning this was the view of
Digvijaya Singh that the Batla encounter was faked and he respected his
view. What should one make out of this? That the Home Minister respected
the view of Digvijaya Singh that the Batla encounter was faked?And yet to
be told that the encounter was genuine. Is this not childish and double
speak? If P.Chidambaram and the Prime Minister holds that the Batla
encounter was genuine but Digvijaya Singh holds the view (along with Rahul
Gandhi) that it was a faked encounter then either the PM and the HM are
lying or Digvijaya Singh is lying. All three cannot be right. Which ever
side is lying ultimately it is the Congress which is lying.
Just for vote bank politics and to appease the Muslims Digvijaya wants to
absolve the two Indian Mujahideen terrorists who were killed while two IM
terrorists were arrested and another fled.If the Batla encounter is faked
then the IM must be absolved and the two arrested freed.May be they have
already been freed. And we have to believe that Police Inspector Mohan
Chandra Sharma laid down his life for a faked encounter. What a sham story
Digvijaya wants to reel out.All this towards garnering Muslim votes. So the
national security-the lives that are lost by the terrorism of the IM needs
to be wiped out and a new chapter must be written under the authorship of
Digvijaya Singh-supervised and approved by Rahul Gandhi. These are the men
whom the nation should trust. Can we really trust them?
Apart from the Batla encounter which puts the PM in a bad light-to lie or
not to lie we have him recently comment on the under nutrition of children
The reports reveals that 49 percent of Indian’s children are under
nourished. This PM states that is a national shame. Any analysis will prove
that the Congress is the national shame for bringing in about this
disastrous situation. Calling itself the oldest national party of 125 years
and having been in power the longest period to put forth this report in
2011 and call it a national shame is a shame on the PM. There is more to
come
Indian bureaucracy has been rated worst in Asia with a 9.21 rating out of
10 is a greater shame. Should we come even worse than Vietnam and Indonesia
with a rating of 8.54 and 8.37 respectively? Is this not a national shame?
If one has to reckon with the deeply engrained corruption in the political
scenario one understands why this national shame. Yet it was a civil
society which had to awaken the conscience of the government and an
Opposition which had to urge it to enacting a strong Lok Pal. But this
failed because corruption is the warp and weft of the Indian political
fabric. It is not easy to divest the fabric of corruption unless we divest
the politicians of their roles. But then everyone swears in democracy. Do
we have one?
It is relevant and necessary to analyze the kind of democracy we have. It
is called democracy because Parliament is supreme it is said .But still we
accept the fact that 60 percent of the Parliamentarians have criminal
records and 60 percent are crorepathis. We are told that they represent the
people…Can there be a greater irony?
So this fork tongued Congress –with its PM and Home Minister as Congress
leaders with a General Secretary of the Congress talking at tangent-we have
the PM citing the 49 percent of children below nutrition level as a
national shame-but silent on having the most corrupt bureaucracy in Asia It
is this most corrupt bureaucracy which runs the government with leaders at
the top who pull in different directions. We proudly proclaim this as
democracy. Yet we witnessed the Parliamentarians who transacted business
with bags of currency within Parliament-we had long ago Buta Singh who
purchased votes with a suitcase of cash. Oh I am sorry, one cannot and
should not speak disparagingly of Parliament because it is sanctimonious
and its sanctity can be defiled in any manner on the floor of the
Parliament by the MPs only but which cannot be questioned. This is
democracy-rule of a few for the few in the name of the people. I call this
a banana Republic in the name of democracy exploiting the Indian masses
Dr Mrs Hilda Raja,
Vadodara..
http://hildaraja.wordpress.
0 comments:
Post a Comment